John Le Carre - High Spy
The wave has broken. The opinion-formers have stepped ashore, raising their surfboards to the sun. It’s a long way from Islington to Mallorca but they made it! Thumbs are up. High fives have never been higher or fivier. Time for cool wine on a marble terrace and a complementary seat next to a gently-dozing old party called David Cornwell. Apparently the set crew forgot to wake him when they moved on. But he’s here. And he’s a seer, all-knowing when it comes to spies and tradecraft. Plus, of course, The Night Manager is an unqualified triumph. And the cast – well my dear! Perfect in every way. A true television event and cheap at £3M an episode.
The wave has broken. The opinion-formers have stepped ashore, raising their surfboards to the sun. It’s a long way from Islington to Mallorca but they made it! Thumbs are up. High fives have never been higher or fivier. Time for cool wine on a marble terrace and a complementary seat next to a gently-dozing old party called David Cornwell. Apparently the set crew forgot to wake him when they moved on. But he’s here. And he’s a seer, all-knowing when it comes to spies and tradecraft. Plus, of course, The Night Manager is an unqualified triumph. And the cast – well my dear! Perfect in every way. A true television event and cheap at £3M an episode.
David Cornwell is smarmed by Pine, post-Corky
How did it happen that a moderately competent spinner
of yarns, which uncomfortably suggest that Britain was post-war and remains today
in thrall to a clique of sex-terrified public schoolboys, came not only to be
revered but actually believed? And that a structure devoid first of credible women
and then of any semblance of humour in particular and real life in general was
accepted as historically sound and admirable?
Perhaps it was the alias that did the trick. Or
pen-name, as it would be called were any less self-avowedly mysterious figure
involved. Maybe it was the gagging credulousness of generations of reporters who
bought his qualifications as an “insider” and believed the shadows he cast were
cool shade indeed. Then again, why blame journalists alone when the high-end literary
world has conspired so enthusiastically in the Le Carre elevation? If Philip
Roth, no less, announces that 1986’s A
Perfect Spy is “the best English
novel since the war,” it must surely be true. Peak Le Carre was reached in that
year and he has been roaming unfettered in the uplands of approbation ever
since.
Of course I exaggerate. A little. There is the Le
Carre whose reputation as a writer is based more on TV adaptations and Alec
Guinness than true literary worth - but is still undoubtedly and fairly rooted
in the virtues of his best book, The Spy
Who Came In From The Cold. And there is the Le Carre, as we have seen,
accepted by lazy journalists and come-day media types as the go-to guy for spy
lore and far-sighted power prophecy. The man who designates the baddie without
challenge as “the worst man in the world” and who decides that the MI6 building
at Vauxhall Bridge is known in government circles as "The River House."


The worst man in the world
Which brings us back to The Night Manager. When
David Cornwell played Hitchcock, sitting at lunch as an extra in that terrace
restaurant scene, suffering a tongue-lashing from Corky and then a soothing
smooth-over from Pine, even he could scarcely have anticipated the unlicensed
critical salivating which the series would provoke. No matter that the sharp
angles of Tom Hiddleston’s face and his ultra-exquisite pronunciation raised a
hint of Kenneth Williams. Irrelevant that Olivia Colman turned in another in a
long line of Olivia Colman performances, this one as Connie Sachs reborn, improbably
pregnant and even more questionably at large in a twenty-first century office
with 1950s-style broken radiators. Forget the impossible prospect of Hugh Laurie,
immortal leader of the Trinity College Tiddlywinkers, being menacing. And,
above all, overlook the fact that absolutely none of what happens in The Night Manager is remotely based on
real power, real espionage or real criminality.
This would be fine
were it not for the fact that Le Carre imposes upon his flimsy inventions the
veneer of certainty-via-experience. It is, as it has been for fifty years, Le Carre’s truth. And therefore to an extent both alarming and risible, our history
No comments:
Post a Comment